GFD logo
  
Username:
Password:
         Home   Log in   Get an account  
Rankings  
Privacy   FAQ   Contact   Chat live  
Stickers   GFD Store  


Stories Comments Both
media Death Shall Not Be Mocked
by TheChisa
gfd messages
(come@me.bro) on May 5, 2012 08:55:10 AM

If you were logged in, you could vote for this story!

or, Why Our Obsession With Celebrities Reveals Just How Broken We Are As A Species
 
It wasn't Whitney Houston that did it. Nor was it Dick Clark, Steve Jobs, Mike Wallace, Ralph McQuarrie, Davy Jones, Don Cornelius, Thomas Kinkade, Moebius, Joe Paterno, Etta James or Heavy D. A few of those were marked by friends with sadness and respect (the domestic partner is still watching old episodes of Soul Train in vigil), a few were noted with small fanfare and tersely polite words like "notable" and "universal". Even the outright despicable ones who were mired in scandal seemed to be given a free pass once the Grim Reaper called their number.

But I fielded it all. I let my friends have their grief, however inappropriate it might have seemed. Heck, I've been guilty of it myself; I wrote an entire article about the death of Michael Jackson, proving I wasn't immune to this social bias for respecting the dead.

No, the straw that broke the camel's back, that made me realize just how utterly full of shit I and my fellow humans were, was MCA of the Beastie Boys.

I shouldn't have to explain who the Beastie Boys are, but I'm going to, because for as ubiquitous as they are in the cultural consciousness, very few people know the things they have actually done. So here's a quick rundown:

• The original lineup of the Beasties included drummer Kate Shellenbach (later of Luscious Jackson) who was asked to leave the group prior to their major Def Jam debut for, you know, being female.

• The song "Pass The Mic", having illegally sampled "Choir" by James Newton, became the focus of the landmark legal case Newton vs Diamond, in which the Beasties counter-sued Newton and won, forcing him, in an unprecedentedly dickish move, to pay a million dollars for being sampled (rather sickeningly ironic seeing as another landmark sampling case, Grand Upright Music, Ltd. v. Warner Bros. Records Inc., had set the very laws the Beasties had flagrantly skirted by assfucking their pal Biz Markie).

• Numerous apocryphal tales exist of them being jerks to session musicians and fans alike, and loads of other rappers have little to no respect for them -- such as MC Serch of 3rd Bass: "To me, they were the Antichrist; they didn't go to Union Square. I was (a white MC) busting my ass in the streets going through what I considered the proper hip-hop, urban channels and these guys go on tour with Run-D.M.C. To me, they were the worst possible thing to happen to hip-hop culture."

In short we have here a group of privileged, misogynist, abusive middle-class Jewish guys whose sole measurable accomplishment is making it socially okay for white people to rap, which, speaking as a white rapper, I'm still not convinced is okay. Oh, and also something something Tibet something.

And yet the outpouring of grief for the passing of only one of these knuckleheads was tremendously disproportionate to both their actual achievements and their social perceptions! Never before have I seen such a deluge of unwarranted hand-wringing from people I otherwise found to be rational and even-headed -- well, no, that's a lie of omission. I should have said from WHITE people. My black friends, whom I assume are well versed in the deaths of rappers from their own genetic lineage, let the moment pass with little more than a shrug.

Though my well-established disgust for the Beastie Boys is certainly not a dismissible variable here, there is a larger point. I am not a monster; my problem here is not with grief itself, which is a necessary and viable emotion for dealing with personal tragedy. My problem is with misplaced grief, offered to people that you didn't know from Adam (Yauch), to whom you had no personal connection except one invented through the use of convenient illusions -- in this particular case, the emotional connection to music.

Now, I could argue until I'm blue in the face the demerits of the Beastie Boys audible offerings, but that's a losing battle. You like the music, I don't. It's pointless to convince you you're wrong, because there is no concrete value for "wrong" here; de gustibus non est disputandum, and that's that. I submit to the possibility that there is a scenario where the Beastie Boys can be considered a worthwhile artistic experience.

But that is all it is -- an artistic experience, not a personal one. The transmission lines go one way, from the musician to you. There is no feedback, no conversation. Any particulars taken from the offerings are coincidental at best, and willful self-reinvention at worst. It's like the whole world never heard the lyrics to "Killing Me Softly".

Twitter and reality television have only made these delusions worse. Now we think we have a connection to Kanye West and Wil Wheaton; now we think that because they put goofballs like us on "Swamp People" and "Ink Master" and "Pawn Stars" that we exist on equal footing with our idols. But that mode of thinking is flawed, because it reinforces the celebrity/nobody divide rather than eradicating it. If there weren't an extant dichotomy that delineated the people worth knowing in the first place, there would be no need to strive for their level of importance. Exceptio probat regulam, to quote Cicero.

Worst of all, in death these defined notables are outright canonized. People have a strong social tendency to refrain from speaking ill of the dead, I surmise because they don't want to be spoken ill of when it's their time. But with celebrity, this is taken to outright absurd levels. Consider the death of politician Strom Thurmond, who was so detestable a human being that his obituary was limited to:

• he was in Congress a really long time
• hey, he wasn't always a racist
• uh... did we mention the really long time thing already?

For that matter, the more recently deceased Kim Jong Il, long vilified as a card-carrying Axis of Evil member, was just plain not talked about except in the context of his progeny, Kim Jong Un, whom was apparently okay to keep calling an evil fuck on account of his being alive.

Enough is enough! I'm tired of this continuous trend of historical revisionism in the service of mortality! Most of these people were horrible assholes.

Whitney Houston: CRACK ADDICT.

Steve Jobs: EXPLOITATIVE ABUSIVE CONTROL FREAK.

Thomas Kinkade: WILDLY CONSERVATIVE ALCOHOLIC MISOGYNIST WHO LITERALLY PISSED ON THINGS TO MARK HIS TERRITORY.

Davy Jones: ...well, okay, you've got me there, he really was just a pretty nice guy. Hey, not everyone is a terrible piece of shit!

If we're to be damned to oblivion, should we not be damned for who we really are, with both the merits and offenses for which we are equally and truly guilty? Ah, but that's the most pernicious ruse of the death ritual, because if one is to judge these celebrities by such standards, one is led to the conclusion that there was no real reason for most of them to be considered important in the first place. And that means we were tricked into believing in the lie of personal connection to said celebrities. And that certainly can't be correct!

So while you sit back and wonder why,
I got this fucking thorn in my side,
Oh my God, it's a mirage,
I'm tellin' y'all,
It's a SABOTAGE!


*turntables*

[ Comment on this story ]


    You know,
    by grandtheftcondom(grandtheftcondom@gmail.com)
    gfd messages
    on May 5, 2012 01:09:58 PM
    (#32464)
    I've never understood why people act like death turns the biggest douchebags into saints.

    When Whitney Houston died most of friends "mourned" her death. They shared hundreds of her songs and videos on Facebook. Which would be fine, if they actually liked Whitney Houston, which they never had. At least, not until she died.

    People do this even to non-celebrities. Dying makes everyone forget how much of ass that person was.

    I know we should respect the dead and all that, but sometimes it's taken too far.

    The only exception are people that have been classified as "evil", like Saddam Hussein, Osama Bin Laden, Hitler, and I'm sure there are others that I can't remember. They were never granted that respect.
    [Reply to this comment]
      I wouldn't even go that far!
      by TheChisa(come@me.bro)
      gfd messages
      on May 5, 2012 02:22:20 PM
      (#32465)
      Fuck respecting the dead! What, is that supposed to be some kind of achievement? You fucking died, just like everyone else who's ever lived. Jesus, the stupid haircut achievement in World of Warcraft is more laudable than just kicking the bucket.
      [Reply to this comment]  [Parent]
        Respecting the dead
        by HappyCouchTyrant(suckafuck@your.moms)
        gfd messages
        on May 5, 2012 07:57:25 PM
        (#32467)
        for me, would be not pissing on their corpse, cutting off body parts for keepsakes, or generally doing things that are a disgrace to yourself as a human being.

        Otherwise, death is no fucking achievement. There isn't a single fucking before us who couldn't die.
        [Reply to this comment]  [Parent]
          My respect for the dead
          by murdersgalore(wacking@yourfuneral.cum)
          gfd messagesMSN
          on May 6, 2012 02:39:11 AM
          (#32468)
          goes far enough to not tell their grieving family what a shit-cock they were right away. The dead are only worthy of any respect they gained while living. If I had this respect for dead people in general, I would have missed out on a lot of parties in graveyards that ended in receiving drunken fellatio.
          [Reply to this comment]  [Parent]
    And in further proof that irony is dead,
    by TheChisa(come@me.bro)
    gfd messages
    on May 5, 2012 03:00:46 PM
    (#32466)
    EFF supports "fair use" tribute to Beastie Boys.
    [Reply to this comment]
    Well...
    by The Master
    gfd messagesMSN
    on May 16, 2012 02:07:59 PM
    (#32496)
    I didn't burst into tears over it, but I did like the 1st 2 rap albums from the 80s...

    I liked them, because they rapped, but they acted like white boys and not trying to act black.

    Unlike the rest, like Vanilla Ice (Ice, Ice, Baby...)...
    [Reply to this comment]
      Okay.
      by TheChisa(come@me.bro)
      gfd messages
      on May 16, 2012 05:46:47 PM
      (#32497)
      What exactly is "acting black"? Please define this term for us so that there is no confusion about your point.
      [Reply to this comment]  [Parent]
        Come on dude thumbs up
        by The Gaborg(Sidekick in my own life)
        gfd messages
        on May 17, 2012 09:00:26 AM
        (#32498)
        You know what he's talking about.

        Black people don't "act black" any more than you act "white" or I act "unreliably disperse insomniac procrastinator".

        However, when white male idiots try to look like they've got (what they think of as) the black coolness pinned down, the are indeed trying to act black, and utterly sucking at it like the pathetic wiggers they actually are.
        [Reply to this comment]  [Parent]
          Ah.
          by TheChisa(come@me.bro)
          gfd messages
          on May 17, 2012 09:05:42 PM
          (#32502)
          So black people don't act black. Because that would be racist. But white people can act black. But white people don't act white. Even though the original comment was about white boys acting white. So.

          We still have not defined "acting black" here, and "you know what he's talking about" isn't a proper response. Is it like, for example, acting like a dog? That I can define pretty easily. Get down on all fours, make woofing noises, stick out your tongue and pant, sniff someone's asshole.

          I just want it explained to me how a person acts when he's acting black. That's all. He brought it up, so I assume he both knows and has no qualms with describing it. No? Feeling a little embarrassed about that? Okay, then let's cut to the chase where I explain why you're both racist assholes.

          When you use the term "acting black" you're not just talking about a mode of behavior; you're legitimizing a point of view, that being that there's a way to "act black" in the first place. Which means you basically have to be forwarding one of two viewpoints:

          1. That there is an inherent behavioral mode to being black. i.e. that activities such as wearing baggy pants, smoking marijuana and listening to music with loud beats are genetically predisposed. This would sufficiently explain why white people shouldn't do it, with the trade off of HOLY FUCKING SHIT IS THAT RACIST.

          2. That there is a learned behavioral mode from existing in a black community. In which case, fuck you, because what social basis is there that says white people couldn't or shouldn't learn those same behaviors if they are exposed to them in their environments? Also, again, GOD DAMN IS THAT RACIST.

          So maybe don't use terms like "acting black" in the first place, guys.
          [Reply to this comment]  [Parent]
            Okay thumbs up
            by The Gaborg(Sidekick in my own life)
            gfd messages
            on May 20, 2012 03:03:30 PM
            (#32506)
            If you want to read racism into my comment, that's a right of yours I won't be denying. I understand. Some days I see boobs everywhere.
            [Reply to this comment]  [Parent]
              Dude, seriously?
              by TheChisa(come@me.bro)
              gfd messages
              on May 20, 2012 07:26:54 PM
              (#32507)
              That's the best you've got? I'm reading racism "into" it because it's fucking there.

              Racism is a tough thing. It's ubiquitous, and we've all internalized it to a degree, but to simply shuck off that you're not doing anything wrong because you don't think you're being racist is foolish and shortsighted; that's a closed loop of responsibility where what you're thinking and feeling doesn't get vetted. In contrast honestly examining yourself is scary and difficult and even the smartest and bravest people I know (for which you may definitely include yourself, for the record) have trouble with it.

              This handy primer by the always fantastic Lindy West is a good place to start thinking about it.
              [Reply to this comment]  [Parent]
                Wait, let's get this straight: gold star
                by The Gaborg(Sidekick in my own life)
                gfd messages
                on May 21, 2012 08:32:56 AM
                (#32508)
                I'm all kinds of racist.
                It was my comment in its context I was defending.

                Am I aggressively racist? No. But I'm a blond, light-skinned, blue-eyed, tallish male, born and raised and living in South America. Without even trying, I reap the benefits of my fucking face on a daily basis. On top of that, I dress and speak in ways that grant me further privileges.
                In order not to be racist, I should be actively fighting these arbitrary advantages every day, all day.
                I do not; therefore I consider myself a racist.

                Now, if you saw where I live and if you saw the clothes I wear and the car I don't have, you'd think "This guy is fucking delusional. Advantages? Privileges? He's white trash at best!"
                And I am, from a technical standpoint I totally am, especially to American eyes I guess.

                But still.

                - If I step into a store past a certain hour in the evening, the storeowner will feel zero restlessness and treat me accordingly.
                - If I offer my bus seat to a certain kind of old lady, I will get slightly bemused glances.
                - If I apply for a job against a guy with my exact same qualifications who does not look like me, I will get the job.
                - If I talk to a police officer, I will be treated a certain way. A better way.


                These are just a handful of examples, and I'm sure there are dozens of other things I don't even notice.

                And then there are the downright horrifying ramifications, like how my tall, fair-haired, blue-eyed kids are one and a half universe removed from their shorter, almond-eyed, cinnamon-skinned cousins in terms of chances, possibilities, and eventual livelihood. These are people who will probably not even be in contact as adults, not because we would champion such a thing, but because time will inevitably pass and the already apparent differences will become deeper and stronger, and the day will come when it's just too fucking awkward to visit anymore. It's already happening, and fuck if I know what to do about it.

                These are all things I should be fighting all the time.
                I was born a privileged invader in a strange land, and if I were true to my conscience, I should dedicate my life to righting the wrongs that make up 99% of my country's history. But I'm not. I don't. Instead, I dedicate my life to trying to improve my own family's situation, living conditions, and chances.

                Does that make me an asshole? Hardly.
                But does it make me a racist? Every day. All day. For the rest of my life.
                [Reply to this comment]  [Parent]
                  That's a glib answer
                  by TheChisa(come@me.bro)
                  gfd messages
                  on May 21, 2012 09:27:45 AM
                  (#32509)
                  but honestly, I think you can do better than the extreme either/or dichotomy there. You're not equivalent to an exploitative, Negro-abusing sharecropper just because you don't spend every waking moment actively battling Ted Nugent's mouth.

                  But you do make one good point. You're not an asshole. That was an unwarranted hyperbole on my part, and I apologize for that and retract it.

                  Srsly tho, don't say "acting black". That shit racist.
                  [Reply to this comment]  [Parent]
                    My asshole was self-aimed
                    by The Gaborg(Sidekick in my own life)
                    gfd messages
                    on May 21, 2012 02:42:21 PM
                    (#32510)
                    No wait, that's anatomically improbable: My use of the word "asshole" was aimed at myself. There.

                    I mean, I wasn't answering to you calling me an asshole (coming from you, I took take it as a term of endearment), I was just trying to make a point and abusing myself a bit in the proceeding, as I'm prone to do.

                    But in the spirit of Let's Drag This Out Beyond Reason 'Cause It's Not Like We Got Shit Else To Do Anyway, how would you describe what Steve Harvey is doing here? Isn't he exaggerating certain traits, as perceived by his own community, for comic effect?

                    And how about Dave Chapelle here? Isn't he changing his accent and inflection in order to better (i.e. more hilariously) portray his white friend?

                    How would you describe what Harvey and Chapelle are doing on those vids, other than acting a certain color?

                    Now, call me a reverse racist, but while I find Chapelle doing that shit hysterical, I can't help thinking that Bill Burr doing the exact opposite would be the most fucking offensive thing ever.

                    Jokes aside: I'm not doing this for the sake of argument. This is a subject that truly intrigues me, and I would really like to know what you think about it.
                    [Reply to this comment]  [Parent]
                      Lindy West, who I linked to above,
                      by TheChisa(come@me.bro)
                      gfd messages
                      on May 21, 2012 03:58:21 PM
                      (#32511)
                      makes this point: humor only works when it's pointed up. Black comedians making fun of how (socially higher) white people talk? Funny as Hell, and has been since Richard Pryor coined that technique. White comedians doing the same for (socially lower) blacks? PAINFULLY AWKWARD.

                      It's the same reason why you don't see celebrity roasts for d-list stars where Tom Cruise and Meryl Streep come out and shit all up in Gary Busey's mouth, and why Mitt Romney CANNOT EVER MAKE A JOKE ABOUT ANYONE ANYWHERE. It's fucking cruel and ridiculously inappropriate even with the best of intentions.
                      [Reply to this comment]  [Parent]
        ?
        by The Master
        gfd messagesMSN
        on May 17, 2012 02:29:04 PM
        (#32500)
        I thought you were more clever than that...
        [Reply to this comment]  [Parent]
      Do you mean...
      by grandtheftcondom(grandtheftcondom@gmail.com)
      gfd messages
      on May 17, 2012 10:23:05 AM
      (#32499)
      They acted like the suburbanites they are instead of acting like "they from da hood"?

      Because that's what I imagine when talks about acting "white" or "black".
      [Reply to this comment]  [Parent]

[ Comment on this story | Back to top ]